Israel votes to refund settlers essays

Israel votes to refund settlers essays Title of the article: Israel votes to refund settlers This article can be summarized in three main points. (a) Ariel Sharon wants to remove 21 Israeli settlements in the Gaza Strip and four of 120 in the West Bank by compensating the Israeli settlers in these areas. (b) Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's questionable proposal can cause great problems within the Likud Party, even though many Israeili citizens support it. (Four Likud ministers opposed the proposal) (c) Mr Sharon supports his proposal basically because he thinks by removing the settlements in these areas the security in Israel will develop for the better. First when I heard about this I thought it was a great idea. I couldn't understand why some ministers opposed the proposal while almost 65% of the Israeli population liked it. Now that I've thought about it I've reached a conclusion. I don't think a person like Ariel Sharon would just decide to remove Israeli settlements from areas they've fought so hard to get. I think he has other motives such as concentrating on larger areas that could give the Israelis more control. Realistically I don't think that this would develop the security of the country. Removing the Israeli settlements in the specific areas would mean that he has to find somewhere to place them. Therefore I believe that this so called withdrawal is just a way for Israel to expand its territory and trick the Palestinians into thinking they're slowly being given a chance to a Palestinian state. Mr Sharon is very clever but I think that if he was really going for peace he would withdraw all the Israeli settlements from the West Bank and not only some. Also, if it was a real withdrawal, the Palestinians would be able to live anywhere in Israel. Therefore I don't think this proposal would bring peace. What we have in these areas is clash of civilizations and therefore I don't thin ...

Why Using Experiential Learning With Adults Is Powerful

Why Using Experiential Learning With Adults Is Powerful Kolb and Frye, two leaders in adult educational theory, say that adults learn best through active participation and reflection. This form of learning is called experiential because it involves hands-on experience and observation as well as discussion and other forms of learning. What Is Experiential Learning? In a sense, experiential learning is simply learning by doing but there is more to the process. Not only do learners take action, but they reflect on, learn from, and take new action based on experience. Kolb and Frye describe experiential learning as a four-part cycle: The learner has concrete experience with the content being taught.The learner reflects on the experience by comparing it to prior experiences.Based on experience and reflection, the learner develops new ideas about the content being taught.The learner acts on her new ideas by experimenting in an experiential setting. When the new ideas are put into action, they become the basis for a new cycle of experiential learning. Examples of Experiential Learning Its important to understand that experiential learning is not identical with hands-on learning or apprenticeship. The purpose of experiential learning is not simply to learn a skill through practice, but also to think critically about the practice and to improve upon it. For a child, hands-on learning might involve mixing baking powder and vinegar and watching it bubble and rise. This activity is good hands-on fun, but it doesnt necessarily provide the child with a full understanding of the chemical interaction between the two materials.   For an adult, hands-on learning might involve working with a trained carpenter to learn how to build a chair. In this case, the learner has gained some skills but has not taken part in experiential learning. The next step would involve taking time to reflect on the experience and compare chair-building to other building projects. Based on reflection, the learner would then develop new ideas about how best to go about building a chair and return to chair building with new insights and ideas. Pros and Cons of Experiential Learning Experiential learning can be very powerful for adults because they have the life experience and cognitive ability to reflect, develop new ideas, and take positive action. It also provides adults with the real-world experience they need to place their new skills in context and to develop new ideas about how to implement their skills. This is particularly true when real-world skills are taught in a classroom context. For example, a classroom experience with providing CPR is very different from a real-world experience in the back of an ambulance. On the other hand, experiential learning has very specific limits. It is only useful when the  content being taught is content that will be used in a real-world setting. So, for example, it is very difficult to provide experiential learning relative to literature, history, or philosophy. Yes, it is possible to take field trips to relevant locations or museums but field trips are quite different from experiential learning.